Home > Hun Sen, Local News > Abhisit and Hun Sen, get on the hotline now

Abhisit and Hun Sen, get on the hotline now

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) session on Monday on the
Thai-Cambodian conflict proceeded more or less along the scripted
scenario. It was no more than a long detour for the two parties
concerned to return to Square One.

Neither side could claim victory. That was probably the whole idea
behind the UNSC members’ decision to invite the Thai and Cambodian
foreign ministers to offer their versions of what has actually
happened.

In the end, it must be a matter for the two sides to try
to negotiate an agreement. And if Asean can serve as the facilitator,
that would help. But first, a “permanent ceasefire” must be in place
and the opposing parties must realise that no third party can
effectively resolve the conflict for them.
The Thai prime minister has called them “border skirmishes” but his Cambodian counterpart Hun Sen insists it’s a “real war”.
Abhisit
Vejjajiva called for bilateral talks to settle the issue. Hun Sen said
only an international forum could solve the two countries’ problems.
Both probably knew that they couldn’t have their way without reaching a
stalemate. And a prolonged stalemate will weaken their respective
positions.
In more ways than one, the ongoing spat between Thailand and Cambodia is bizarre, bordering on the absurd.
Why?
This is probably one of the few cases of an international incident in
which diplomats on both sides talk like warriors while their military
colleagues hold “peace talks” in the disputed area.
How do you explain this scenario?
Thai
Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya and his Cambodian counterpart Hor
Namhong met and shook hands during the so-called Thai-Cambodian Joint
Commission meeting in Siem Reap earlier this month. Both sides agreed
to revive the Joint Boundary Commission (JBC) meetings, and tentatively
scheduled the next one for later this month. But a week later, the
president of Cambodia’s JBC, Var Kimhong, was quoted by the Xinhua News
Agency as saying: “There will be no meeting of the JBC later this
month. Now, bilateral mechanisms cannot resolve the issue.”
On
the same day, when the question was posed to him, Thai Premier Abhisit
was quoted as saying: “I believe the JBC meeting will proceed as
scheduled.”
But Thailand’s JBC chief, Asda Jayanama, is busy with
something else. He has not focused on boundary work. Instead, the
veteran diplomat has been busy lobbying Unesco in Paris to try to get
officials from the UN cultural body to stay away from the disputed
Preah Vihear Temple and adjacent area.
Thai authorities claim
that Cambodian soldiers fired the first shots that triggered this round
of skirmishing. Hun Sen says it doesn’t matter who pulled the first
trigger – because he is telling the whole world that Thailand is the
“invader”.
Abhisit hit back: “It’s not true that we are the
invaders. Their call for a third party to intervene, or for a UN
peacekeeping force, is irrelevant.”
So, can Asean chairman Marty
Natalegawa, Indonesia’s foreign minister, who accompanied the Thai and
Cambodian foreign ministers to the Security Council meeting this week,
be described as a “third party?”
Apparently not. Both Abhisit and
Hun Sen seem ready to make use of his presence for their respective
benefit – as long as his “neutrality” means that Asean won’t take a
stand and that the scheduled meeting of foreign ministers in Jakarta on
February 22 ends with the usual call for restraint and good neighbourly
relations. Even the term “bilateral discussions” could become
controversial.
Marty says it’s going to be a “brief, urgent and
informal” gathering with his Asean counterparts. Yes, there is such a
thing as measuring up to what he calls “the expectations of the
international community”. But then, despite Hun Sen’s attempt to
internationalise or “regionalise” the conflict, any real and lasting
solution can only be concluded at the bilateral level.
What
transpired from the UNSC meeting on Monday wasn’t what Cambodia had
demanded. Thailand didn’t get what it wanted either. The UN wasn’t
sending a team of observers or a peacekeeping force. But then, it
didn’t rule in favour of Thailand’s request for bilateral talks either.
Asean would be involved, which means that it’s not going to be strictly
a bilateral affair.
The ball is now back between Bangkok and
Phnom Penh. Asean can at best serve as cheerleader. No matter how
Herculean the task at hand, the leaders of the two countries will have
to hammer out a solution with the current joint committees at various
levels.
And unless Abhisit and Hun Sen get on the hotline to
signal to their respective people that they have entered talking mode,
the war of words and real military skirmishes will continue, and
probably get worse before the general atmosphere improves.

The Nation

Advertisements
Categories: Hun Sen, Local News
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: