Home > Computer, Mobiles, Technology > Why Microsoft Should Buy Nokia And Not RIM

Why Microsoft Should Buy Nokia And Not RIM

Microsoft, Steve Ballmer. Image: AP
If Microsoft decides to boost its smartphone position with a major acquisition, it should buy Nokia, not Research in Motion.

Some would argue that Nokia isn’t really a smartphone maker and
Symbian isn’t really a smartphone OS, and that RIM would be a much
better fit with Microsoft’s traditional enterprise focus. All true.

But Microsoft wouldn’t be buying Nokia for its software. Microsoft
has a fine smartphone software platform–Windows Phone 7 is the freshest
take on a smartphone user interface since the iPhone came out in 2007,
it performs well on cutting-edge phones, and it’s got a well-designed
and easy-to-use development platform (albeit with some weird
restrictions that Microsoft will probably ease up on next year).

Yes, it’s got some functional gaps–multitasking, copy and paste–but Microsoft is racing to fill those gaps
now, and by fall 2011 the platform should be functionally on par or
very close to the leaders in the field, Google’s Android and Apple’s
iOS.

Microsoft would be buying Nokia for its distribution channels, supply
chain, manufacturing relationships, hardware design expertise, and
global brand. Instead of having to convince hardware makers to ship
Windows Phone 7, Microsoft could ship it, on its own handsets, to a
global market that’s going to be making the shift from feature phones to
smartphones over the next five years.

This would would be a significant change in Microsoft’s character as a
company–it would be entering the hardware business in a big way for
the first time. But that’s historically the only reason Microsoft makes big acquisitions–to get into a new market quickly.

Why not RIM? Because RIM’s main value is its software and integration
with Microsoft Exchange in corporate datacenters–two areas where
Microsoft is proving itself quite capable. If Microsoft were going to
buy RIM to replace its creaky old Windows Mobile platform, it should
have jumped two years ago, before building Windows Phone 7. That ship
has sailed.

For hardware, RIM doesn’t have anything near the global footprint of
Nokia, but would cost almost as much–its market cap stands at $30.4
billion versus Nokia’s $38.0 billion. If Microsoft is going to get into
the phone business, it should buy number one.

Of course, there’s the bigger issue of whether Microsoft should get
into the phone business at all. After all, Google managed to get Android
to nearly 25% global market share in less than two years with software
alone. Can Microsoft really risk alienating its current hardware
partners?

It may have no choice.

Google has a two year head start. When Android emerged, phone makers
were desperate for a smartphone platform that was somewhat competitive
with the iPhone. Android took them most of the way there.

Since then, Android has managed to ship on millions of handsets.
Developers have built more than 200,000 apps for the Android
Marketplace. If Microsoft waits to grow its share organically, it’s
going to have a hard time convincing developers to favor Windows Phone 7
instead of going with the much bigger Android platform (not to mention
iOS). Lack of apps means less consumer interest means fewer phones sold
means less developer interest means lack of apps…and so on, down into
the death spiral.

Google also has a different business model than Microsoft. Every time
a new socket is created for the Internet, Google is more likely than
any other company to earn some money from that socket–despite the rise
of Facebook, users conduct an awful lot of Internet searches, and most
of those searches are powered by Google. So Google can give its software
away and still make money.

Microsoft doesn’t have that big, profitable Internet advertising
business, and phones don’t have many natural ties to Microsoft’s core
business in desktop PC software–in fact, smartphones tend to replace
PCs. For Windows Phone 7, Microsoft gets a paltry $15 (or less) per
handset, and perhaps some peripheral benefits like locking enterprises
into Exchange (or Exchange Online) for mobile e-mail. That’s not enough
to justify the huge investment necessary to be competitive in this
market.

It’s still early days for Windows Phone 7, but check back in six
months. If Windows Phone 7 still hasn’t started to ramp up its market
share with an Android-like hockey stick curve, Microsoft’s last best bet
is to start selling phones. And buying Nokia would be the quickest way
to go hard into that business.

Microsoft’s other option at that point would be to get out of the
mobile OS business altogether and focus on pushing other Microsoft
software and services–Office, Exchange, SharePoint, Bing, Hotmail,
Windows Azure, and so on–to every smartphone platform out there.

Microsoft isn’t known for giving up so easily.

businessinsider.com

Advertisements
Categories: Computer, Mobiles, Technology
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: